Hawaii Governors Race: Republican Challenger Gary Cordery Faces Incumbent Josh Green in a Solid Democratic Contest
The Cook Political Report rates the Hawaii gubernatorial contest as “Solid Democratic,” citing a Partisan Voting Index of D+13. The state’s political history reflects that assessment: no Republican has held the governor’s office since Linda Lingle left office in 2010, and the last Republican victory in any statewide election was in 2006. Green, who was elected in 2022 with 63.2% of the vote, is seeking a second term.
Campaign finances illustrate the structural advantage of incumbency. According to finance reports compiled by the Honolulu Civil Beat, Governor Green’s campaign has raised roughly $3.5 million. That fund supports statewide television advertising, a sophisticated organizing apparatus, and outreach across the islands. In contrast, Cordery’s campaign has raised about $313,000. The disparity is significant in a state where travel between islands incurs high costs and logistical complexity.
Green’s approval rating is reported at 56%, a figure that reflects his leadership during public‑health crises and the 2023 Maui wildfires. Cordery, meanwhile, positions himself as a grassroots alternative. He describes his candidacy as a “rescue mission” for Hawaii’s working families, arguing that the state’s government has become disconnected from ordinary residents.
Cordery’s platform centers on affordable housing and cost‑of‑living relief. He proposes building 15,000 fee‑simple homes priced between $400,000 and $600,000, targeting teachers, healthcare workers, first responders, and young families. The plan calls for the use of state‑owned land for residential development and the streamlining of permitting processes that currently delay construction. The goal is to increase the supply of homes that are affordable for local workers.
On taxes, Cordery advocates eliminating the state’s General Excise Tax (GET) on essential goods such as food and medicine, a regressive tax that disproportionately burdens lower‑income families. He also proposes a property‑tax freeze for retirees to protect seniors from rising property values. Cordery argues that Hawaii’s $20.5 billion budget is far larger than that of New Hampshire—$7.75 billion—despite similar populations of about 1.4 million. He cites this comparison to highlight what he sees as fiscal waste and calls for audits of state agencies.
The race also reflects broader concerns about Hawaii’s cost of living. Cordery has tapped into the frustration of residents who feel priced out of the islands, citing the need to leave for the mainland. His message emphasizes stewardship of natural and human resources, transparency, and accountability.
The political landscape in Hawaii has been shaped by a series of events that underscore the difficulty of a Republican challenge. Lieutenant Governor Sylvia Luke, who had been running for a second term, withdrew on April 19, 2026 after a bribery scandal. The primary on August 8, 2026 was the only election since 2010 where the Republican nominee was not Duke Aiona.
As the election approaches, the contest remains a referendum on Hawaii’s direction. Green offers continuity and the stability of an established Democratic administration. Cordery represents a call for reform, focusing on practical solutions to housing, taxes, and government spending. The outcome will be decided on November 3, 2026, when voters across the islands cast ballots.
The current situation is that Green maintains a substantial financial lead and a 56% approval rating, while Cordery’s campaign relies on grassroots engagement and a platform aimed at addressing cost‑of‑living concerns. No Republican has won a statewide election in Hawaii since 2006, and the Cook Political Report’s “Solid Democratic” rating suggests a challenging path for Cordery. The next steps for both campaigns involve finalizing their platforms, mobilizing voters, and preparing for the November election.
The race will be closely watched by observers who see it as a test of Hawaii’s political resilience and the viability of a Republican challenge in a historically Democratic state.