In March 2026, the tranquil waters of Lake Michigan became the backdrop for a tragedy that would ignite a national debate. 18‑year‑old Sheridan Gorman was shot on a pier in Chicago, a crime that left her family and lawmakers grappling with questions about the city’s sanctuary stance.

The alleged killer, Jose Medina, is an undocumented immigrant who crossed the U.S.–Mexico border in May 2023. Border Patrol officials apprehended him near the Texas line, and after he signaled he did not fear deportation, he was released into the United States and transported to Chicago. A month later, in June 2023, Chicago police arrested Medina for shoplifting at Macy’s. Police again failed to notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and released him. Medina missed his court appearance on the shoplifting charge, leading to a warrant that remained active through March 2026, when he allegedly shot Sheridan in the back of the neck as she fled.

The case spotlights Chicago’s sanctuary policies, which restrict local law‑enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Mayor Brandon Johnson has defended the city’s sanctuary status, while Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has backed state‑wide sanctuary laws. The policies bar police from sharing immigration‑related information with ICE, a practice the Gorman family claims helped Medina evade federal scrutiny.

At a House Judiciary Committee hearing in Washington, D.C., Jessica Gorman—Sheridan’s mother—delivered a testimony that ran longer than the allotted five minutes. She said, “My daughter should be alive,” and asked, “When did protecting our American citizens stop being your first priority?” She described Sheridan as a “buddy bench” helper in kindergarten, a metaphor the family used to illustrate the vulnerability of children. Jessica urged Congress to sit on a “buddy bench” and to explain why sanctuary policies mattered more than the life of an American youth.

The hearing was punctuated by criticism of committee conduct. Jessica noted that some members appeared asleep, were on their phones, or had come and gone during the session. She also responded to Chicago Alderwoman Maria Hadden’s comment that Sheridan was in the “wrong place at the wrong time.” The family issued a public statement rebuking the remark and calling for a review of sanctuary policies.

Sheridan’s family belongs to a network of families who have lost children to killings by undocumented immigrants, a group the families refer to as “Angel families.” They have organized public statements and interviews to draw attention to their cases and to the broader debate over sanctuary policies.

The case has reignited discussion over the impact of sanctuary policies on public safety. The Gorman family argues that the policies create a “haven for predators” and place a strain on local resources. They are calling for changes to how Chicago and Illinois cooperate with ICE and for accountability for the police who released Medina.

At present, the alleged killer remains at large, and no federal or local agency has issued a new warrant. The House Judiciary Committee has not announced a follow‑up hearing. The Gorman family remains in Washington, D.C., awaiting further congressional action. The city and state have not issued a formal response to the family’s demands.

The case underscores the ongoing national debate over sanctuary policies, immigration enforcement, and public safety. Sheridan’s testimony has added a personal narrative to the discussion and may influence future policy debates and congressional hearings.